← My Government dashboard

Michigan Government Watch

Dossier Legislative introduced 02-dec-2025
Bill introduced in the Michigan Legislature — not yet passed by either chamber, and not law.

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles; create and provide penalties for using unmanned vehicles in a restricted zone or flight path. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5321’25

Key claim: Michigan would create a state database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned aircraft and impose penalties for flying drones in those zones, via a new act tie-barred to HB 5321.

Abstract

(HB5321 · 103rd Legislature) Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles; create and provide penalties for using unmanned vehicles in a restricted zone or flight path. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5321’25 Sponsor: Rep. Luke Meerman ® + 27 co-sponsors Latest vote: Reported With Recommendation With Substitute H-3 — 10-5 (passed, 2026-03-10) Latest action (2026-05-12): Placed On Third Reading

Why this matters

This bill would move Michigan from site-specific criminal trespass enforcement (sec. 45a key facilities) toward an affirmative, list-based UAS airspace regime — a state database that operators would be expected to consult before flying. If enacted, it would create a new locus of infrastructure regulation covering any facility or corridor added to the database, with penalties defined outside the penal code.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned vehicles; create and provide penalties for using unmanned vehicles in a restricted zone or flight path. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5321'25
Stage: introduced · legiscan · 02-dec-2025

Michigan would create a state database of restricted zones and flight paths for unmanned aircraft and impose penalties for flying drones in those zones, via a new act tie-barred to HB 5321.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: legiscan:2055976:introduced

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine introduced proposed rule passed chamber jcar review executive order final rule enacted appeals opinion opinion

build build 392 · ea9c128-dirty · 2026-08-09