← My Government dashboard

Michigan Government Watch

Dossier Legislative introduced 14-may-2026
Bill introduced in the Michigan Legislature — not yet passed by either chamber, and not law.

Public utilities: other; contracts to service data centers; require to be treated as a contested case. Amends 1939 PA 3 (MCL 460.1 - 460.11) by adding sec. 6bb.

Key claim: HB5982 would require public-utility contracts to service data centers to be treated as contested cases under Michigan’s utility statute.

Abstract

(HB5982 · 103rd Legislature) Public utilities: other; contracts to service data centers; require to be treated as a contested case. Amends 1939 PA 3 (MCL 460.1 - 460.11) by adding sec. 6bb. Sponsor: Rep. Reggie Miller (D) + 3 co-sponsors In committee: H Government Operations Latest action (2026-05-19): Bill Electronically Reproduced 05/14/2026

Why this matters

Treating data-center service contracts as contested cases would open utility deals with large hyperscale loads to formal MPSC adjudication, giving ratepayer advocates, intervenors, and competitors a chance to scrutinize cost allocation and terms. For utilities and data-center developers, it adds procedural time and disclosure risk to what have historically been confidential bilateral arrangements. The change fits a broader Michigan legislative pattern of layering oversight onto rapidly growing data-center electricity demand.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Public utilities: other; contracts to service data centers; require to be treated as a contested case. Amends 1939 PA 3 (MCL 460.1 - 460.11) by adding sec. 6bb.
Stage: introduced · legiscan · 14-may-2026

HB5982 would require public-utility contracts to service data centers to be treated as contested cases under Michigan’s utility statute.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: legiscan:2149928:introduced

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine introduced proposed rule passed chamber jcar review executive order final rule enacted appeals opinion opinion

build build 392 · ea9c128-dirty · 2026-08-09