← My Government dashboard

Michigan Government Watch

Dossier Legislative passed chamber 25-jun-2026
Passed the Michigan House or Senate, but not yet both — still not law.

Trade: consumer goods and services; use of surveillance pricing in the sale of certain consumer items; prohibit. Amends secs. 2 & 7 of 2011 PA 15 (MCL 445.312 & 445.317). TIE BAR WITH: HB 6098’26

Key claim: Michigan HB6099 would prohibit the use of surveillance pricing in the sale of certain consumer items by amending the 2011 Consumer Protection Act.

Abstract

(HB6099 · 103rd Legislature) Trade: consumer goods and services; use of surveillance pricing in the sale of certain consumer items; prohibit. Amends secs. 2 & 7 of 2011 PA 15 (MCL 445.312 & 445.317). TIE BAR WITH: HB 6098’26 Latest action (2026-07-01): Referred To Committee On Economic And Community Development

Why this matters

Surveillance pricing — using individualized consumer data to set personalized prices — is an emerging concern for Michigan shoppers, and HB6099 extends the prohibition into a second statute (2011 PA 15) beyond the primary Consumer Protection Act vehicle. For consumers, this means broader statutory coverage against algorithmic price discrimination; for retailers and platforms, it signals compounding compliance obligations across multiple trade-practice laws. The tie-bar with HB6098 indicates the Legislature is treating this as a coordinated package rather than a single-act reform.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Trade: consumer goods and services; use of surveillance pricing in the sale of certain consumer items; prohibit. Amends secs. 2 & 7 of 2011 PA 15 (MCL 445.312 & 445.317). TIE BAR WITH: HB 6098'26
Stage: passed chamber · legiscan · 25-jun-2026

Michigan HB6099 would prohibit the use of surveillance pricing in the sale of certain consumer items by amending the 2011 Consumer Protection Act.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: legiscan:2153930:passed-chamber

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine introduced proposed rule passed chamber jcar review executive order final rule enacted appeals opinion opinion

build build 392 · ea9c128-dirty · 2026-08-09