No-Fault PIP Domicile & Priority Determination
Current understanding
To be populated as evidence accumulates.
Evidence log
- 2026-07-22 — Frownfelter v Esurance Property & Casualty Insurance Company: Michigan Supreme Court in Frownfelter v Esurance Property & Casualty Ins Co overruled Grange Ins Co of Michigan v Lawrence and held that a custody order does not conclusively establish a child’s domicile for no-fault PIP priority purposes; courts must apply the traditional Workman/Dairyland multi-factor domicile analysis, including where the child actually spends the majority of time. (novelty: 4)
Open questions
Related
Contributing findings
Frownfelter v Esurance Property & Casualty Insurance Company
22-jul-2026
novelty 4
per-area 4
introduces