← My Government dashboard

Government Watch

Dossier Executive proposed rule 20-oct-2026 Comment closes · 15-dec-2026 · in 35 days
Draft regulation published for public comment — not yet in force.

Medicare Program; Implementation of Sections 6219, 6220, and 6224 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026

Key claim: CMS proposes rules that would change Medicare Part D cost-sharing for low-income enrollees, require more accurate public lists of health providers, and add new accountability requirements for pharmacy benefit managers.

Abstract

(Proposed Rule · Health and Human Services Department, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) This proposed rule would implement section 6219 (Adjustments to Medicare Part D Cost-Sharing Reductions for Low-Income Individuals), section 6220 (Requiring Enhanced and Accurate Lists of (REAL) Health Providers Act), and section 6224 (Modernizing and Ensuring Pharmacy Benefit Manager Accountability) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026.

Why this matters

This proposed rule is the operational step that turns three Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 provisions into enforceable Medicare requirements — adjusting what low-income Part D enrollees pay, how accurately plans must list in-network providers, and how PBMs are held accountable. Because it is a proposed rule, specifics may shift before finalization, but it signals the direction CMS intends for Part D cost-sharing and PBM oversight.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Medicare Program; Implementation of Sections 6219, 6220, and 6224 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026
Stage: proposed rule · federal-register · 20-oct-2026

If you are a low-income Medicare Part D enrollee, this proposed rule would change your drug cost-sharing and the accuracy of the provider directories your plan publishes.

CMS proposes rules that would change Medicare Part D cost-sharing for low-income enrollees, require more accurate public lists of health providers, and add new accountability requirements for pharmacy benefit managers.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: fedreg:2026-21420

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine resolution introduced proposed rule passed chamber executive action final rule enacted district opinion circuit opinion opinion

build build 600 · dacf81d · 2026-11-09