← My Government dashboard

Government Watch

Dossier Executive proposed rule 01-oct-2026 Comment closes · 30-nov-2026 · in 20 days
Draft regulation published for public comment — not yet in force.

Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses

Key claim: The FTC is starting a rulemaking that could restrict search engines, social media sites, and other digital marketplaces from practices that help scammers impersonate the government or businesses, and is asking the public to comment on whether such a rule is needed.

Abstract

(Proposed Rule · Federal Trade Commission) The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) proposes to commence a rulemaking proceeding to prevent certain unfair or deceptive acts or practices by search engine, social media, and other digital marketplace platforms that further government and business impersonation scams to defraud consumers. The Commission is soliciting written comment, data, and arguments concerning the need for such rulemaking.

Why this matters

This is a rare move to put direct conduct obligations on search engines, social media platforms, and digital marketplaces for third-party scam content, rather than relying solely on Section 230 defenses or voluntary trust-and-safety practices. If finalized, it would expand the FTC’s platform-liability footprint beyond its existing impersonation rule for individuals, shaping how platforms screen ads, listings, and search results tied to government and business identities.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses
Stage: proposed rule · federal-register · 01-oct-2026

If you run a search engine, social media site, or digital marketplace, the FTC is taking public comment on a rule that could hold your platform accountable when it enables government or business impersonation scams.

The FTC is starting a rulemaking that could restrict search engines, social media sites, and other digital marketplaces from practices that help scammers impersonate the government or businesses, and is asking the public to comment on whether such a rule is needed.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: fedreg:2026-20143

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine resolution introduced proposed rule passed chamber executive action final rule enacted district opinion circuit opinion opinion

build build 600 · dacf81d · 2026-11-09