← My Government dashboard

Government Watch

Dossier Executive proposed rule 06-oct-2026
Draft regulation published for public comment — not yet in force.

Proposal of Special Measure Regarding Convertible Virtual Currency Mixing, as a Class of Transactions of Primary Money Laundering Concern; Withdrawal

Key claim: FinCEN is withdrawing its proposal to treat international crypto mixing as a class of high-risk money-laundering transactions that would have required extra recordkeeping and reporting.

Abstract

(Proposed Rule · Treasury Department, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) FinCEN is withdrawing its finding and proposed rulemaking, pursuant to section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act, that international Convertible Virtual Currency (CVC) mixing is a class of transactions of primary money laundering concern and that a special measure requiring enhanced recordkeeping and reporting requirements should be imposed regarding this class of transactions.

Why this matters

Section 311 class-wide designations are a rarely used, powerful AML tool; applying one to crypto mixing would have imposed bank-like reporting and recordkeeping on any U.S. financial institution touching mixer-related CVC flows. Withdrawing the proposal pulls back from a signature Biden/Yellen-era crypto AML initiative and signals that FinCEN will continue to address mixing risks through entity-specific designations, sanctions, and existing BSA authorities rather than a categorical rule.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Proposal of Special Measure Regarding Convertible Virtual Currency Mixing, as a Class of Transactions of Primary Money Laundering Concern; Withdrawal
Stage: proposed rule · federal-register · 06-oct-2026

If you are a bank or money transmitter handling crypto transactions, you will not face the proposed class-wide Section 311 recordkeeping and reporting requirements on international crypto mixing activity.

FinCEN is withdrawing its proposal to treat international crypto mixing as a class of high-risk money-laundering transactions that would have required extra recordkeeping and reporting.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: fedreg:2026-20429

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine resolution introduced proposed rule passed chamber executive action final rule enacted district opinion circuit opinion opinion

build build 600 · dacf81d · 2026-11-09