← My Government dashboard

Government Watch

Dossier Legislative enacted 27-nov-2006
Signed into law (or passed over a veto) — now binding federal law.

Lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2005

Key claim: Congress ordered a study of whether a specified stretch of Connecticut’s lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook should join the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System and authorized funding for that study.

Abstract

(S435 · 109th Congress) (This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on December 8, 2005. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2005 - Amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a specified segment of the lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook in Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Authorizes appropriations. Latest action (2006-11-27): Became Public Law No: 109-370.

Why this matters

Suitability studies are the gating step before any river can enter the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, which brings federal protections against new dams and adverse water-resource projects along designated reaches. Authorizing a study for the lower Farmington and Salmon Brook signals congressional interest in a partnership-style designation for a developed Northeast watershed, while leaving actual land-use and permitting effects contingent on later legislation.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Act of 2005
Stage: enacted · congress · 27-nov-2006

If you live or own land along the studied reaches of Connecticut's lower Farmington River or Salmon Brook, this 2005 law only triggered a federal suitability study — it did not by itself impose Wild and Scenic restrictions on your property.

Congress ordered a study of whether a specified stretch of Connecticut’s lower Farmington River and Salmon Brook should join the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System and authorized funding for that study.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: congress:109-s-435:enacted

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine resolution introduced proposed rule passed chamber executive action final rule enacted district opinion circuit opinion opinion

build build 600 · dacf81d · 2026-11-09