← My Government dashboard

Government Watch

Dossier Executive proposed rule 11-sep-2026 Comment closes · 10-nov-2026 · today
Draft regulation published for public comment — not yet in force.

Eliminating the Discretionary 60-Day Grace Period

Key claim: DHS proposes to eliminate the 60-day grace period that certain temporary work-visa holders and their families currently receive after a job ends, so they would lose lawful status as soon as employment stops.

Abstract

(Proposed Rule · Homeland Security Department) The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposes to remove regulations at 8 CFR 214.1(l)(2) to restore its previous and long- standing policy of not providing aliens in certain nonimmigrant classifications (and their dependents) with an up to 60-day grace period upon cessation of employment prior to the expiration of the alien’s authorized period of stay. This proposal restores a direct relationship between an alien’s nonimmigrant status and the specific employment or activity that formed the basis of his or her admission or grant of status in the United States and reduces administrative burden.

Why this matters

The 60-day grace period is the main cushion that lets H-1B, L-1, O-1, E, and TN workers (and their families) remain lawfully present after a layoff while they search for a new sponsor, change status, or arrange departure. Eliminating it would mean status ends the day employment does, shrinking the practical margin for error in an already time-pressured system and increasing the risk of unlawful presence, work-authorization gaps, and forced rapid departures for a large affected population.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Eliminating the Discretionary 60-Day Grace Period
Stage: proposed rule · federal-register · 11-sep-2026

If you hold an employment-based nonimmigrant visa such as H-1B, L-1, O-1, E, or TN, this proposal would end your lawful status the day your job ends, with no 60-day window to find new work or depart.

DHS proposes to eliminate the 60-day grace period that certain temporary work-visa holders and their families currently receive after a job ends, so they would lose lawful status as soon as employment stops.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: fedreg:2026-18631

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine resolution introduced proposed rule passed chamber executive action final rule enacted district opinion circuit opinion opinion

build build 600 · dacf81d · 2026-11-09