← My Government dashboard

Government Watch

Dossier Legislative introduced 07-jan-2025
Bill introduced in Congress — not yet passed by either chamber, and not law.

SEC Act of 2025

Key claim: The SEC Act of 2025 would require that separate securities law violations sharing a common cause, the same misstatement or omission, or a continuing failure to comply be counted as a single violation for penalty purposes.

Abstract

(HR216 · 119th Congress) Securities Enforcement Clarity Act of 2025 or the SEC Act of 2025 This bill specifies when separate occurrences of securities law violations must be considered as a single violation for purposes of calculating penalties. Specifically, separate occurrences must be counted as a single violation when the acts in question are the result of (1) a common or a substantially overlapping cause, (2) the same misstatement or omission, or (3) a continuing failure to comply. The bill applies to various violations of securities law, including those involving the registration, offer, and sale of securities; and the conduct of brokers, dealers, and investment advisers. Latest action (2025-01-07): Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

Why this matters

How violations are counted directly determines the size of SEC civil monetary penalties, since per-violation caps multiplied by many alleged instances (per investor, per filing, per day) drive headline enforcement numbers. By collapsing violations sharing a common cause or continuing failure into a single count, the bill would materially reduce maximum exposure for issuers, advisers, and broker-dealers, and shift bargaining leverage in settlements. It fits a broader legislative and administrative pattern of reining in SEC enforcement discretion.

Source

Link

Briefing card

SEC Act of 2025
Stage: introduced · congress · 07-jan-2025

The SEC Act of 2025 would require that separate securities law violations sharing a common cause, the same misstatement or omission, or a continuing failure to comply be counted as a single violation for penalty purposes.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

External: congress:119-hr-216:introduced

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

Stages other doctrine resolution introduced proposed rule passed chamber executive action final rule enacted district opinion circuit opinion opinion

build build 392 · ea9c128-dirty · 2026-08-09