← My Government dashboard

Government Watch

Mentioned 1× · first seen 08-jul-2026 · last seen 08-jul-2026

Tax-Sale Foreclosure – Takings Clause & Just Compensation

Current understanding

Following Tyler v. Hennepin County (2023), which held that government retention of surplus equity in tax-sale foreclosures constitutes a Fifth Amendment taking, the open question was how just compensation is measured. In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court held that just compensation is measured by the actual auction sale price (with surplus proceeds returned to the former owner) rather than the property’s hypothetical fair market value, and further held that the Eighth Amendment Excessive Fines Clause imposes no greater remedy. Practical effect: delinquent taxpayers whose properties are sold at tax auction receive surplus above tax debt but bear the risk of below-market auction outcomes; municipalities face narrower liability than a fair-market-value rule would impose.

Evidence log

Open questions

Related

Contributing findings

SCOTUS opinion
Pung v. Isabella County
23-jun-2026 novelty 3 per-area 3 introduces

Ask about this page

Replies are grounded in this page's wiki content and the findings linked above. Citations to findings render as [F123] links.

Stages other doctrine resolution introduced proposed rule passed chamber executive action final rule enacted district opinion circuit opinion opinion

build build 392 · ea9c128-dirty · 2026-08-09